The Launch

With the Pascal product out of the way, let's dig into the actual launch, which again is a hard launch from NVIDIA and their partners. It's been a long road, but NVIDIA now has mobile parts which are powerful enough to drop the "M" designation, and it's partners are eager to add the new card to their products.

The design of the notebook GPU has varied depending on what product it is, and what the target market is. It's no different this time around, and GTX 10-Series for notebooks will be available in a variety of form factors. MXM cards will be available for some of the larger gaming laptops around, and there will also be soldered on versions too for thinner and lighter designs. But NVIDIA has added some features to improve the end result. For example, NVIDIA will be using Dual-FET power supplies and multi-phase power controllers. This should give a smoother voltage level, and is likely one of the reasons NVIDIA is allowing overclocks on their mobile parts now.

Another feature that we saw introduced last year on the notebook was G-SYNC, and with Pascal, this has been updated as well. Previously it was only available on select laptops with a 1920x1080 panel, up to 75 Hz refresh rate. With the GTX 10-Series, the resolution has been increased to 2560x1440, and G-SYNC will now support panels with up to 120 Hz refresh rate. The standard caveats will still apply though. G-SYNC on a notebook will only work if the GPU is directly connected to the display, so that rules out any notebooks with Optimus support.

Comparing GTX 10-Series to the outgoing Maxwell based parts shows that there is going to be a significant amount of performance gained. The bottom end of the lineup should see a substantial increase in performance, with not only double the CUDA cores, but a 192-bit bus on the GTX 1060, compared to just a 128-bit bus on the GTX 960M.

NVIDIA High-End/Midrange Mobile GPU Specification Comparison
  GTX 1070 GTX 1060 GTX 970M GTX 960M
CUDA Cores 2048 1280 1280 640
Texture Units 128 80 80 40
ROPs 64 48 48 16
Core Clock 1442MHz 1404MHz 924MHz 1097MHz
Boost Clock 1645MHz 1670MHz Undefined Undefined
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5 8Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 256-bit 192-bit 192-bit 128-bit
FP64 1/32 1/32 1/32 1/32
GPU GP104 GP106 GM204 GM107
Transistor Count 7.2B 4.4B 5.2B 1.87B
Manufacturing Process TSMC 16nm TSMC 16nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Launch Date 08/16/2016 08/16/2016 10/07/2014 03/12/2015

Moving up the product stack to the GTX 1080, it considerably outclasses the older cards, including the GTX 980 for notebooks, with more CUDA cores, 10 Gbps GDDR5X memory, and 8 GB of RAM.

NVIDIA High-End Mobile GPU Specification Comparison
  GTX 1080 GTX 980 GTX 980M GTX 880M
CUDA Cores 2560 2048 1536 1536
Texture Units 160 128 96 96
ROPs 64 64 64 32
Core Clock 1556MHz 1064MHz 1038MHz 954MHz
Boost Clock 1733MHz Undefined Undefined Undefined
Memory Clock 10Gbps GDDR5X 7Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit
FP64 1/32 1/32 1/32 1/24
GPU GP104 GM204 GM204 GK104
Transistor Count 7.2B 5.2B 5.2B 3.5B
Manufacturing Process TSMC 16nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Launch Date 08/16/2016 09/22/2015 10/07/2014 03/12/2014

With this being a hard launch, NVIDIA has already started with shipements to their partners, and pretty much every single gaming laptop manufacturer is already shipping, or will shortly be shipping, updated product lines to take advantage of this new GPU. Most of the devices shipping now are going to be refreshes of existing product lines, but we may see some new designs in the not too distant future as well. NVIDIA is expecting designs around $1300 as a starting place, but I would expect several manufacturers to quickly get under the $1000 threshold on their competitively priced gaming notebooks.

Pascal is a major update to the notebook, with pretty substantial performance increases accross the board. With the first new GPU capable process in many years, architectures have been patiently awaiting the chance to stretch their legs with the latest FinFET transistors. NVIDIA is able to pack more transistors in the same space, and the FinFET design limits current leakage enough that we've finally got desktop class capability in a portable form factor.

With several manufacturers already shipping updated designs, we should have some review units in soon to check out the latest GPU.

The Product
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • RaichuPls - Wednesday, August 17, 2016 - link

    If you check out the Tomshardware 1060 review, they had a power vs clockspeed graph. At 1.5 GHz, it only consumed around 60W.
  • Xajel - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    Edit, just came from they listed 1060m as having a 75W TDP ( just assumption as usual ), so this means that 1060m is the successor to 970M and not 960M, as 970M has a 75W TDP also, and 960M have 60W TDP
  • jabbadap - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    If you look chip tier, it would be successor of gtx965M(gm206 version). Although they were soldered to motherboard like gtx960m was it used different chip(gm107). If you are waiting real gtx960m successor then you have to wait gp107 mobile variants. Was there any information given about mobile gtx 1060: is it mxm card or soldered? Did not catch my eye by skimming the article.

    Notebookcheck review of gtx965m:
  • Morawka - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    yeah everyone wants to see the 1060m performance numbers and we'd also love to know the TDP.

    The 1070m and 1080m are interesting, but it seems nvidia is worried about performance more than TDP. They could have given us GTX 980m performance at 50% of the power required. the normal 980m was a 100w part, so it could be a 50w part with the node shrink.

    they really need to release TDP numbers to the public. thats kind of silly, the OEM's have to know.
  • MrSpadge - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    > They could have given us GTX 980m performance at 50% of the power required.

    That's approximately GTX 1060 in its mobile trim, or up to a future slightly cut-down GTX 1050.
  • SunLord - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    "To follow: GTX 1060 Review (hopefully Friday), RX 480 Architecture Writeup/Review, and at some point RX 470 and RX 460 are still due."

    So given it took 14 days beyond the "hopefully" Friday for the GTX 1060 review to show up can we expect the 480 write up some time in September?
  • WorldWithoutMadness - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    This makes me wonder, what's the trigger for notching up the game?
    Pressure from TB externalGPU to mobile GPU?
  • nightbringer57 - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    The very low peak power consumption of this generation, coupled with the fact that the "consumer" high end tends to not be the absolute highest-end of the range anymore (see the "titan" trend). It's mostly just because they can, I guess.
  • MrSpadge - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    That's because modern laptops can handle higher power levels and can be sold according to their performance.
  • Jon Tseng - Tuesday, August 16, 2016 - link

    Laptops also the majority of PC units sold, so in the long term this is the growth market (despite lack of upgradability - I guess Thunderbolt helps!). Makes sense to want to give them a bit more love.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now