Today at Meizu's event in China the company presented their new flagship phone, the MX5. The MX5 is the successor to the MX4 released last year, and while I haven't been able to review that unit yet, I did take an extensive look at its bigger brother, the MX4Pro.

The MX5's biggest characteristic is the change in display technology. Meizu has now adopted Samsung's AMOLED screen in place of the traditional LCD technology. This also leads to a change in form-factor as now Meizu had to abandon its 16:10 aspect-ratio for the more conventional 16:9 resolutions. At 1080p and 5.5" diagonal, the screen isn't as high resolution as one might have expected and thus regresses in terms of DPI in comparison to the MX4. This is a diamond-structure PenTile subpixel arrangement so the effective resolution is thus even less than the MX4, something one might have to be wary of in a 5.5" phone such as this.

An important metric is power consumption, the MX5 is supposed to use up 40% less power than the MX4's screen, this might point out that PSR is now being employed on the new unit as the MX4 notoriously suffered from a lack of the technology. The screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 3.

Meizu MX5 Specifications
SoC MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795
8x Cortex A53 @ 2.2GHz
PowerVR G6200 @ 700MHz+
NAND / Storage 16 / 32 / 64GB
Display 5.5" 1920x1080 SuperAMOLED
Network 2G / 3G / 4G LTE
(Chinese Bands)
Dimensions 149.9 x 74.7 x 7.6mm
149 grams
Camera 20.7MP Sony IMX220 sensor F/2.2 Main camera
w/ Laser auto-focus

5MP F/2.0 Front camera
Battery 3150mAh
OS Android 5.0
with Meizu FlymeOS 4.5
Connectivity 802.11 b/g/n/ac + BT 4.1 + BLE, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS
SIM Size nanoSIM + nanoSIM

Meizu continues to employ MediaTek's SoCs in its device as we see the MX5 use a new Helio X10 / MT6795. This is a successor to the MT6595 which employed A17 and A7 cores in a big.LITTLE configuration. I was fairly impressed with the performance and battery life of the MT6595 itself, while I'm sort of doubtful the new A53 cores will be able to outperform it in real use-cases, it should still work very well and also improve battery life for the new device. The MX5 comes with a standard 3GB of LPDDR3 memory.

Due to the screen's change in aspect ratio, the MX5 is 6mm taller than the MX4, although width has gone down 0.5mm and the new phone is now also thinner at 7.6 instead of 8.9mm - all without sacrificing battery capacity (And likely battery life) as it now actually even gains 50mAh for a total of 3150mAh.

The camera system remains largely the same, but Meizu now uses a better lens system that is supposed to improve quality of the image. This is still a Sony IMX220 20.7MP sensor with an F2.2 aperture lens. What is new is that there's now a laser auto-focus system right under the flash LED, enabling fast-focus for down to 0.2s according to Meizu.

The fingerprint sensor that we've seen on the MX4Pro carries over to the MX5, enabling a variety of OS security functions such as unlocking the device or accessing private folders or galleries on your phone.

The phone ships with Meizu's FlymeOS 4.5 Android 5.0 operating system. The interesting part here is that Meizu announced its plans to open-source parts of the OS and upload them to GitHub for community development. This might attract a lot of enthusiast users as having a modding-friendly device can vastly increase the life-span of a model beyond what the OEM is willing to offer in terms of support.

For now the device is aimed at the Chinese market (And thus only offers limited western frequency bands) coming in at ¥ 1799, ¥ 1999 and ¥ 2399 (USD $290, $320, $386) price-points for 16, 32 or 64GB versions.

Source: Meizu

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Zertzable - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    Eight cores is flat out silly. If they really want to stick with big.LITTLE (which is a debatable decision considering Intel had proven race to sleep works), Snapdragon 808 seems to be the most interesting CPU configuration: 4 low power cores for the numerous, but light background tasks and two big cores for heavier loads which is generally a single app in mobile devices.
  • doogless - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    I agree. 8 identically clocked cores - ones that are normally the LITTLE portion of big.LITTLE - just doesn't make any sense.
  • xdrol - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    It's mainly for Chinese market, where more cores = bigger penis, no matter what sense does it make.
  • hans_ober - Wednesday, July 1, 2015 - link

    Sadly true.
    More cores is a gimmick. Sure, apps can use it; but single threaded perf is also very important.
    Dunno about the seconds part though ;)
  • tabascosauz - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    The 1080p screen only serves to remind everyone that the Helios X10's GPU is not worthy of a 2015 flagship phone. Adreno 320-level performance? No thanks.

    Everyone looks at the "PowerVR Series 6 Rogue" prefix and automatically assumes that it's a worthy competitor to the GX6430/GXA6850. The G6200 is looking like the spiritual successor to the SGX540: widely adopted, well-known, and horribly slow in the face of its competitors.
  • nikaldro - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    This phone is all about big numbers.
    Oh 20 MPixels wooow! 8 cores! PowerVR 6!
    Even at that price, you can find better deals if you jump off the hype train and into the real world.
  • hans_ober - Wednesday, July 1, 2015 - link

    Remember when Mali 400 was famous?
    Low end phones (still) sue it; too bad it's the 1 core edition.
  • hans_ober - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    8x Cortex A53 @ 2.2GHz

    What a waste.
  • Riyasomani - Wednesday, July 1, 2015 - link

    The Specification of this phone is simply awesome. It looks like Apple iphone. Round corners are making it more attractive.
  • edwd2 - Wednesday, July 1, 2015 - link

    Give the hate a rest. I'd take a 6795T anyday over an overheating 810. The A53 is power efficient and has decent single threaded performance (~1000 on gb3). The G6200 @ 700MHz is pretty much on par with the Adreno 330 and beats it in actual gaming, and comes quite close to the G6430 found in Apple's A7. Qualcomm's offerings are more expensive, and their A57 cores prove to be a disaster. The 810v2.1 runs like a 808 with typically at most 2 A57 cores active and tests have shown that each consumes up to 4W under load. MediaTeK's mid-end offering are quite impressive this year especially the 6752.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now